Skip to contentSkip to content
Platform Comparison

GRCTrack vs Vanta

Honest PCI DSS compliance platform comparison. Feature matrix, pricing, strengths, and which platform fits your needs.

12
Features Compared
9
GRCTrack Advantages
$6,000+
Vanta Starting Price

At a Glance

PCI-First

GRCTrack

Founded2024
HeadquartersUnited Kingdom
Primary FocusPCI DSS v4.0.1
PCI SupportFull
Starting Price$149/year
AI Engines7 specialised engines
Frameworks10 supported

Vanta

Founded2018
HeadquartersSan Francisco, USA
Primary FocusSOC 2, ISO 27001
PCI SupportPartial
Starting Price$6,000+/year
Pricing ModelPer-framework, annual contract
Frameworks5+ supported

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

12 features evaluated across PCI compliance, AI, training, and platform capabilities.

Full support
Partial support
Not supported
FeatureGRCTrackVantaNotes
PCI DSS v4.0.1 depthGRCTrack maps every sub-requirement with evidence and implementation guides; Vanta offers high-level PCI support added to its SOC 2 core.
QSA marketplaceOnly GRCTrack has an integrated QSA directory with AI-powered matching.
Guided assessment wizardSAQ-specific guided workflows for each SAQ type (A, A-EP, B, C, D).
AI engines7 specialised AI engines vs Vanta's single AI assistant.
Phishing simulationBuilt-in phishing campaigns with human risk scoring.
Training & awarenessFull LMS with PCI-specific courses vs Vanta's basic training integration.
Evidence automationBoth offer strong evidence automation; Vanta has more cloud integrations.
Gap detectionBoth offer continuous monitoring; GRCTrack adds PCI-specific gap remediation workflows.
Acquirer featuresGRCTrack has a dedicated Acquirer Command Centre for portfolio management.
White-labelFull white-label with custom domains, logos, and colours.
Multi-framework breadthVanta supports 20+ frameworks; GRCTrack supports 10 with deeper PCI focus.
Pricing transparencyGRCTrack publishes pricing from $149/year; Vanta requires sales call.

Where Vanta Wins

  • +Stronger cloud integration ecosystem
  • +More framework coverage (20+)
  • +Larger enterprise customer base
  • +More mature product (founded 2018)

Where GRCTrack Wins

  • +Purpose-built for PCI DSS by QSAs
  • +Integrated QSA marketplace
  • +Built-in phishing simulation
  • +Full training LMS
  • +80% lower starting price
  • +Acquirer portfolio management

Which Platform Is Right for You?

Choose Vanta if...

SaaS startups needing SOC 2 as their primary framework, with PCI as secondary.

Choose GRCTrack if...

Merchants, QSA firms, and acquirers who need deep PCI DSS compliance with integrated training and assessment workflows.

Our Verdict

Vanta is an excellent choice for SOC 2-first organisations with broad GRC needs. GRCTrack is the better choice when PCI DSS is your primary compliance requirement, thanks to its QSA-built assessment workflows, integrated marketplace, and dramatically lower pricing for PCI-focused compliance.

Comparison based on publicly available information as of January 2025. We encourage you to verify directly with each vendor. Platform names are trademarks of their respective owners. GRCTrack is not affiliated with Vanta Inc..

Ready to see GRCTrack in action?

Join organisations that chose the PCI-first compliance platform. Start your free trial or explore our full platform comparison.

Start Free TrialBook a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GRCTrack better than Vanta for PCI compliance?
For PCI DSS specifically, yes. GRCTrack was built by QSAs with assessment-grade requirement mapping, SAQ-specific workflows, and an integrated QSA marketplace. Vanta's PCI support is a module added to its SOC 2-focused platform.
Does Vanta support PCI DSS v4.0.1?
Vanta offers PCI DSS support but with less depth than PCI-native platforms. It provides general control mapping rather than sub-requirement-level detail and lacks SAQ-specific workflows.
Which is cheaper, GRCTrack or Vanta?
GRCTrack starts at $149/year for SAQ-A compliance. Vanta typically starts at $6,000+/year with annual contracts. For PCI-focused compliance, GRCTrack is significantly more affordable.